<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript Code Coverage Tool for Firebug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Test Driven JavaScript Code Coverage using JSCoverage</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Test Driven JavaScript Code Coverage using JSCoverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-813</guid>
		<description>[...] coverage tools for JavaScript exist: ProtoCov, the commercial JavaScript coverage Validator, and some sort of FireBug add on. But these are noted for future investigation as I have not used these. If you have used [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] coverage tools for JavaScript exist: ProtoCov, the commercial JavaScript coverage Validator, and some sort of FireBug add on. But these are noted for future investigation as I have not used these. If you have used [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Saw another tool for JavaScript code coverage in a link to my page, and it's got command line, and line reporting!
http://siliconforks.com/jscoverage/

Source:
http://rplcodeline.blogspot.com/2008/03/javascript-code-coverage.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw another tool for JavaScript code coverage in a link to my page, and it&#8217;s got command line, and line reporting!<br />
<a href="http://siliconforks.com/jscoverage/" rel="nofollow">http://siliconforks.com/jscoverage/</a></p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://rplcodeline.blogspot.com/2008/03/javascript-code-coverage.html" rel="nofollow">http://rplcodeline.blogspot.com/2008/03/javascript-code-coverage.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Well, it uses the default table structure given from Firebug.  So, if that feature gets added into Firebug, it'll be usable here.  I don't think I want to be the one to add resizeable columns though.

You could buy a higher resolution monitor? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it uses the default table structure given from Firebug.  So, if that feature gets added into Firebug, it&#8217;ll be usable here.  I don&#8217;t think I want to be the one to add resizeable columns though.</p>
<p>You could buy a higher resolution monitor? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jokin</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>do you have a place where request features or submit bugs? it will be good if the columns size would be resizable, i have some calls to long uri scripts (.net weresource.axd with a chunk of encoded data on the parameters) and i'm not capable of view the functions called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you have a place where request features or submit bugs? it will be good if the columns size would be resizable, i have some calls to long uri scripts (.net weresource.axd with a chunk of encoded data on the parameters) and i&#8217;m not capable of view the functions called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Top-notch!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top-notch!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Well, it doesn't report on nested functions inside of objects.  So, for example, say you have two identical functions located inside two different objects.

YAHOO.util.Dom.getStyle()
DAVIDBURNS.getStyle()

would unfortunately both be reported as getStyle in the current plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it doesn&#8217;t report on nested functions inside of objects.  So, for example, say you have two identical functions located inside two different objects.</p>
<p>YAHOO.util.Dom.getStyle()<br />
DAVIDBURNS.getStyle()</p>
<p>would unfortunately both be reported as getStyle in the current plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>David Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>This is really good tool. I really like it as I am trying to automate any and all items that i can. 

I do have one question though. I ran a selenium test and one of the items that code coverage picked up showed a function in both Function Called and Function Uncalled. 

Why is this?

Thats my only question but its really good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really good tool. I really like it as I am trying to automate any and all items that i can. </p>
<p>I do have one question though. I ran a selenium test and one of the items that code coverage picked up showed a function in both Function Called and Function Uncalled. </p>
<p>Why is this?</p>
<p>Thats my only question but its really good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>It's currently in the &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/sandbox" rel="nofollow"&gt;sandbox&lt;/a&gt;.  They won't make it public until it has a certain amount of reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s currently in the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/sandbox" rel="nofollow">sandbox</a>.  They won&#8217;t make it public until it has a certain amount of reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Cool extension. Why don't you publish it in Mozilla Ads-ons page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool extension. Why don&#8217;t you publish it in Mozilla Ads-ons page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aravind</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Aravind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have a requirement (may be strange) as follows:

- Execute blackbox test cases using GUI
- Hopefully, there is a tool that can record all my actions while I execute blackbox test and play back.
- The tool should be able to export the recorded instructions as HTTPUNIT tests.
- I need in particular HTTPUNIT or any other tests basically to see the code coverage of JSP/JAVA files.

Is there anything for this?
Please help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have a requirement (may be strange) as follows:</p>
<p>- Execute blackbox test cases using GUI<br />
- Hopefully, there is a tool that can record all my actions while I execute blackbox test and play back.<br />
- The tool should be able to export the recorded instructions as HTTPUNIT tests.<br />
- I need in particular HTTPUNIT or any other tests basically to see the code coverage of JSP/JAVA files.</p>
<p>Is there anything for this?<br />
Please help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
