<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS 3 Text: A Tale of writing-mode Woe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zachleat.com/web/css3-text-writing-mode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/css3-text-writing-mode/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: luke barker</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/css3-text-writing-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>luke barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/?p=496#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>yes, the emulation is problematic in that the actual block in the flow is different when emulated to the writing-mode block. I forget which is which :) I think us web developers will soon be bale to add this to our designs though - I am interested in seeing if writing-mode is as consistently supported in ie9 too - don&#039;t suppose you know? nice blog. Laters. Luke. (I live in Glasgow!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, the emulation is problematic in that the actual block in the flow is different when emulated to the writing-mode block. I forget which is which :) I think us web developers will soon be bale to add this to our designs though &#8211; I am interested in seeing if writing-mode is as consistently supported in ie9 too &#8211; don&#8217;t suppose you know? nice blog. Laters. Luke. (I live in Glasgow!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Boarman&#39;s dot com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The ruby element and her hawt friends, rt and rp</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/css3-text-writing-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Boarman&#39;s dot com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The ruby element and her hawt friends, rt and rp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/?p=496#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>[...] On the styling side, there’s the W3C CSS3 Ruby Module (2003). It’s based on Ruby Annotation’s ‘complex ruby’ and is being updated for HTML5 &lt;ruby&gt;. Because of this, it’s also yet to be implemented beyond the default IE-level formatting. Ruby text will be used in combination with the W3C CSS Text Layout Module Level 3 properties direction, block-flow, and writing-mode for alternative text flow (such as vertical text), but again these have poor implementation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the styling side, there’s the W3C CSS3 Ruby Module (2003). It’s based on Ruby Annotation’s ‘complex ruby’ and is being updated for HTML5 &lt;ruby&gt;. Because of this, it’s also yet to be implemented beyond the default IE-level formatting. Ruby text will be used in combination with the W3C CSS Text Layout Module Level 3 properties direction, block-flow, and writing-mode for alternative text flow (such as vertical text), but again these have poor implementation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Po-chiang Chao</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/css3-text-writing-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Po-chiang Chao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/?p=496#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>About the &quot;tb-rl&quot; part, IMO this might not be a very good emulating method, since CJK characters also &quot;rotated&quot; 90 degree with CSS transform, which is wrong -- CJK characters should be remained normal, and just the &quot;text flow&quot; rotated. 

I only have this case tried this on Firefox, but I think the behavior of Webkit, and other browser rendering engines which don&#039;t support writing-mode, will do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the &#8220;tb-rl&#8221; part, IMO this might not be a very good emulating method, since CJK characters also &#8220;rotated&#8221; 90 degree with CSS transform, which is wrong &#8212; CJK characters should be remained normal, and just the &#8220;text flow&#8221; rotated. </p>
<p>I only have this case tried this on Firefox, but I think the behavior of Webkit, and other browser rendering engines which don&#8217;t support writing-mode, will do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

