<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript Code Coverage Tool for Firebug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:43:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: 10个Firefox扩展使firebug更强大 &#124; 大嘴的窝棚</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>10个Firefox扩展使firebug更强大 &#124; 大嘴的窝棚</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 09:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>[...] 7. FirebugCodeCoverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7. FirebugCodeCoverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Useful Firefox Extensions to Supercharge Firebug - AjaxJ.F &#124; ZendFramework &#124; Codeigniter &#124; Jquery &#124; Ajax</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Useful Firefox Extensions to Supercharge Firebug - AjaxJ.F &#124; ZendFramework &#124; Codeigniter &#124; Jquery &#124; Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>[...] 7. FirebugCodeCoverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7. FirebugCodeCoverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, I&#039;ve updated the article with information about the future of this plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, I&#8217;ve updated the article with information about the future of this plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 可增强Firebug功能的十款Firefox插件 : 前端思考：专注前端开发，关注用户体验</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>可增强Firebug功能的十款Firefox插件 : 前端思考：专注前端开发，关注用户体验</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>[...] 7. FirebugCodeCoverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7. FirebugCodeCoverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: well</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>well</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>hey,  cool looking add-on, any word on it being compatible with FF 3.3?

thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey,  cool looking add-on, any word on it being compatible with FF 3.3?</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron T. Grogg</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron T. Grogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>hey, Zach, cool looking add-on, any word on it being compatible with FF 3.0.10 or .11?

thanks,
Atg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, Zach, cool looking add-on, any word on it being compatible with FF 3.0.10 or .11?</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Atg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VELO</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>VELO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Any hope to update it for firefox 3.0?

VELO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any hope to update it for firefox 3.0?</p>
<p>VELO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Awesome Daniel!

Any plans for integration with Firebug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Daniel!</p>
<p>Any plans for integration with Firebug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Colascione</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Colascione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Check out the hrtimer Firefox extension, which contains a both a line-by-line code coverage tool for Javascript and a call-graph profiler. The package is still in development, but it&#039;s useful now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the hrtimer Firefox extension, which contains a both a line-by-line code coverage tool for Javascript and a call-graph profiler. The package is still in development, but it&#8217;s useful now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test Driven JavaScript Code Coverage using JSCoverage</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Test Driven JavaScript Code Coverage using JSCoverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-813</guid>
		<description>[...] coverage tools for JavaScript exist: ProtoCov, the commercial JavaScript coverage Validator, and some sort of FireBug add on. But these are noted for future investigation as I have not used these. If you have used [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage tools for JavaScript exist: ProtoCov, the commercial JavaScript coverage Validator, and some sort of FireBug add on. But these are noted for future investigation as I have not used these. If you have used [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Saw another tool for JavaScript code coverage in a link to my page, and it&#039;s got command line, and line reporting!
http://siliconforks.com/jscoverage/

Source:
http://rplcodeline.blogspot.com/2008/03/javascript-code-coverage.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw another tool for JavaScript code coverage in a link to my page, and it&#8217;s got command line, and line reporting!<br />
<a href="http://siliconforks.com/jscoverage/" rel="nofollow">http://siliconforks.com/jscoverage/</a></p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://rplcodeline.blogspot.com/2008/03/javascript-code-coverage.html" rel="nofollow">http://rplcodeline.blogspot.com/2008/03/javascript-code-coverage.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Well, it uses the default table structure given from Firebug.  So, if that feature gets added into Firebug, it&#039;ll be usable here.  I don&#039;t think I want to be the one to add resizeable columns though.

You could buy a higher resolution monitor? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it uses the default table structure given from Firebug.  So, if that feature gets added into Firebug, it&#8217;ll be usable here.  I don&#8217;t think I want to be the one to add resizeable columns though.</p>
<p>You could buy a higher resolution monitor? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jokin</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>do you have a place where request features or submit bugs? it will be good if the columns size would be resizable, i have some calls to long uri scripts (.net weresource.axd with a chunk of encoded data on the parameters) and i&#039;m not capable of view the functions called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you have a place where request features or submit bugs? it will be good if the columns size would be resizable, i have some calls to long uri scripts (.net weresource.axd with a chunk of encoded data on the parameters) and i&#8217;m not capable of view the functions called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Top-notch!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top-notch!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Well, it doesn&#039;t report on nested functions inside of objects.  So, for example, say you have two identical functions located inside two different objects.

YAHOO.util.Dom.getStyle()
DAVIDBURNS.getStyle()

would unfortunately both be reported as getStyle in the current plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it doesn&#8217;t report on nested functions inside of objects.  So, for example, say you have two identical functions located inside two different objects.</p>
<p>YAHOO.util.Dom.getStyle()<br />
DAVIDBURNS.getStyle()</p>
<p>would unfortunately both be reported as getStyle in the current plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>David Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>This is really good tool. I really like it as I am trying to automate any and all items that i can. 

I do have one question though. I ran a selenium test and one of the items that code coverage picked up showed a function in both Function Called and Function Uncalled. 

Why is this?

Thats my only question but its really good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really good tool. I really like it as I am trying to automate any and all items that i can. </p>
<p>I do have one question though. I ran a selenium test and one of the items that code coverage picked up showed a function in both Function Called and Function Uncalled. </p>
<p>Why is this?</p>
<p>Thats my only question but its really good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s currently in the &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/sandbox&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sandbox&lt;/a&gt;.  They won&#039;t make it public until it has a certain amount of reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s currently in the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/sandbox" rel="nofollow">sandbox</a>.  They won&#8217;t make it public until it has a certain amount of reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Cool extension. Why don&#039;t you publish it in Mozilla Ads-ons page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool extension. Why don&#8217;t you publish it in Mozilla Ads-ons page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aravind</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Aravind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have a requirement (may be strange) as follows:

- Execute blackbox test cases using GUI
- Hopefully, there is a tool that can record all my actions while I execute blackbox test and play back.
- The tool should be able to export the recorded instructions as HTTPUNIT tests.
- I need in particular HTTPUNIT or any other tests basically to see the code coverage of JSP/JAVA files.

Is there anything for this?
Please help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have a requirement (may be strange) as follows:</p>
<p>- Execute blackbox test cases using GUI<br />
- Hopefully, there is a tool that can record all my actions while I execute blackbox test and play back.<br />
- The tool should be able to export the recorded instructions as HTTPUNIT tests.<br />
- I need in particular HTTPUNIT or any other tests basically to see the code coverage of JSP/JAVA files.</p>
<p>Is there anything for this?<br />
Please help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.zachleat.com/web/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zachleat.com/web/2007/04/18/javascript-code-coverage-tool-for-firebug/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>This is an absolutely amazing plugin for Firebug! I was looking all over the net for something like this, and it was a PERFECT fit! 

Of course, I&#039;d love some more features :) Please please please add: 
1) Support for nested function - OO-style. If there&#039;s a class MyClass and a function MyFunction, it would be awesome if you displayed it like &quot;MyClass.MyFunction&quot;
2) Click to navigate to the definition of the function. Firebug already has a great code browser, it would be amazing to be able to click on a function name in your plugin and go directly to the place in code where it&#039;s defined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an absolutely amazing plugin for Firebug! I was looking all over the net for something like this, and it was a PERFECT fit! </p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;d love some more features :) Please please please add:<br />
1) Support for nested function &#8211; OO-style. If there&#8217;s a class MyClass and a function MyFunction, it would be awesome if you displayed it like &#8220;MyClass.MyFunction&#8221;<br />
2) Click to navigate to the definition of the function. Firebug already has a great code browser, it would be amazing to be able to click on a function name in your plugin and go directly to the place in code where it&#8217;s defined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

